Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime5 Days
Run DateJun 29 '18 at 18:42
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-6700K-$342
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
SC Int 128
SC Float 127
SC Mixed 131
103% 129 Pts
QC Int 424
QC Float 472
QC Mixed 430
100% 442 Pts
MC Int 654
MC Float 763
MC Mixed 714
106% 710 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$450
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Lighting 382
Reflection 352
Parallax 353
115% 362 fps
MRender 243
Gravity 393
Splatting 247
128% 294 fps
Poor: 98%
This bench: 123%
Great: 142%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC300 120GB-$102
76GB free
Firmware: 524ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 390
Write 222
Mixed 246
63% 286 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 37.1
142% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 201
153% 206 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 81%
Samsung NVMe MZVPV256HDGL-00000 256GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 5,953
Write 98.1
Mixed 192
433% 2,081 MB/s
4K Read 736
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 11.7
1,134% 251 MB/s
Poor: 141% Great: 244%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 101
Write 107
Mixed 94.1
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 67%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
230GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 42.3
Write 43.3
Mixed 32.4
50% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 21%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$144
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
50.9% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 14.7
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 95%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 6,160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $92

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,025
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $356Nvidia GTX 1070 $344Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i5-8600K $249AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $135
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $167SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback