PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus SABERTOOTH X99 (all builds) |
Memory | 0.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20170113 |
Uptime | 1.2 Days |
Run Date | Jul 04 '18 at 20:07 |
Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
81%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.6%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 138 39 63 64 57 MB/s
|
57.2%
Above average
|
|||
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
274GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 76 76 76 75 MB/s
|
47.1%
Average
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
446GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 69 70 69 69 MB/s
|
40.6%
Average
|
|||
WD Elements SE 25FF 4TB
2TB free, PID 25ff
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 94 95 95 96 95 MB/s
|
54.4%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
69.8%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 352x |
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 156x |
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 126x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 106x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 85x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 73x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $606 |