Asrock H170M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H170M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '18 at 01:43
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 84.1
1-Core 57.1
2-Core 110
54% 83.8 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 164
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Lighting 50.4
Reflection 46.4
Parallax 41.8
41% 46.2 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 37.3
32% 39.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2316RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 235 218 231 235 216 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 464
Write 262
Mixed 168
SusWrite 226
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 32.4
124% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 122
124% 205 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
364GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 373 442 463 474 449 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 451
Mixed 384
SusWrite 429
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 58.8
195% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 347
265% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%
WD My Passport Essential USB 3.0 500GB
10GB free, PID 0730
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 50 54 52 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 49.9
Write 49.9
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 48
63% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$78
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 19.2
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 11.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 73.3
54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H170M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $411
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback