PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z170M Pro4S (all builds) |
Memory | 11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160714 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 13 '18 at 00:43 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 41% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
72.1%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.1%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 187 176 174 177 187 MB/s
|
100%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
255GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 118 126 127 123 128 MB/s
|
48.2%
Average
|
|||
WD My Passport 259F 1TB
615GB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 92 92 94 94 MB/s
|
39.5%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
77.2%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 95x |
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 66x |
Core i5-6500Intel $70Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 50x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 38x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 23x |
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 20x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $465 |