bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DP67BA
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '18 at 05:17
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 177
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 322
45% 333 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Lighting 47.9
Reflection 32.2
Parallax 39.1
39% 39.7 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 42.8
Splatting 37.6
32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900210
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 167 184 187 172 185 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.7% Poor
Read 216
Write 109
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 173
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 4.4
30% 7.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 87%
Intel X25-E Extreme 32GB
29GB free
Firmware: 045C8621
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 186 193 195 189 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 237
Write 192
Mixed 200
SusWrite 188
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 22.3
78% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 155
121% 165 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 123 124 126 125 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 65
Write 108
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 122
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.5
178% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1333 C8 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback