| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L LE (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20121207 |
| Uptime | 2 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 16 '18 at 16:12 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | URY-User |
| Background CPU | 64% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48.7%
Average
|
44% 69.8 Pts
|
29% 250 Pts
|
17% 272 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.31
|
16.4%
Very poor
|
17% 17.6 fps
|
16% 19.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 98 116 140 145 138 MB/s
|
79%
Very good
|
78% 107 MB/s
|
96% 0.77 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
349GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 120 121 123 122 122 MB/s
|
68.7%
Good
|
74% 101 MB/s
|
162% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
24.1%
Poor
|
24% 8.23 GB/s
|
16% 5.7 GB/s
|
37% 107 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L LE Builds (Compare 216 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L LE
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 34x |
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 27x |
| FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 19x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 11x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 9x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |