Average Bench: 97.9% (9th of 113)

Based on 1,993 user benchmarks.  Model: Kingston KHX3200C16D4/32GX 2x31.5GB

Excellent average bench

The Kingston KHX3200C16D4/32GX 2x31.5GB averaged just 2.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Kingston KHX3200C16D4/32GX 2x31.5GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 42.5GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 32.9GB/s

Very poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Kingston KHX3200C16D4/32GX 2x31.5GB is 71.4%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Kingston KHX3200C16D4/32GX 2x31.5GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 76.4ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 23.6GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 1,993 samples)
Min Avg Max
26.3 MC Read 42.5 81.8
18.1 MC Write 32.9 41.3
20 MC Mixed 31.9 42.3
102% 35.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
15.6 SC Read 23.6 30.9
17.5 SC Write 28.8 45.3
19.1 SC Mixed 30.9 39.8
79.4% 27.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
59.2 Latency 76.4 98.5
52.4% 76.4 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 99.6
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 33.4
157% 54.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 31.5
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 43
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 39.7
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 25
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 37.1
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 38
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 30.4
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 43.4
SC Mixed 29.8
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 54.3
74% 54.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 27
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 25.3
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 33
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 25.6
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 28.5
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 24.5
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 25.6
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 19.6
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 22.3
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 24.3
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 28.6
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 25.8
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
1,993 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 45,637,755 RAM Kits tested.

Typical KHX3200C16D4/32GX 2x31.5GB Builds (Compare 72,413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $1,112

Popular KHX3200C16D4/32GX 2x31.5GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2021 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

113 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback