Average Bench: 94.4% (15th of 115)

Based on 513 user benchmarks.  Model: Kingston KHX3200C20S4/32GX 2x31.5GB

Excellent average bench

The Kingston KHX3200C20S4/32GX 2x31.5GB averaged just 5.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Kingston KHX3200C20S4/32GX 2x31.5GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 39.1GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 36.8GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Kingston KHX3200C20S4/32GX 2x31.5GB is 26.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Kingston KHX3200C20S4/32GX 2x31.5GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 81.4ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 19.9GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 513 samples)
Min Avg Max
29.1 MC Read 35.8 40.9
29.6 MC Write 36.8 41.8
24 MC Mixed 29.8 35.2
97.5% 34.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
14.5 SC Read 19.9 28.1
25.1 SC Write 39.1 45.8
18.3 SC Mixed 25.9 32.6
80.9% 28.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
59.2 Latency 81.4 113
49.1% 81.4 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 32.1
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 30.6
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 31.6
96% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 40.6
SC Mixed 30.8
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 31.8
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 38.4
SC Mixed 27.1
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 30.7
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 21.2
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 33
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 32.9
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 22.2
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 24.7
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 26.8
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 25.5
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 25.5
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 25.8
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 26.4
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 27.1
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
513 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,006,717 RAM Kits tested

Typical KHX3200C20S4/32GX 2x31.5GB Builds (Compare 1,374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP OMEN Laptop 15-en0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular KHX3200C20S4/32GX 2x31.5GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback