Average Bench: 45.2% (119th of 132)

Based on 60 user benchmarks.  Model: Nanya NT4GC64C8HG0NS-CG 2x4GB
Poor: 26%Average: 45.2% Great: 52%

Below average average bench

The Nanya NT4GC64C8HG0NS-CG 2x4GB averaged 54.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.


Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 16.7GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 15.9GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nanya NT4GC64C8HG0NS-CG 2x4GB is 26.1%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Nanya NT4GC64C8HG0NS-CG 2x4GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 10.9GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 11.8GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 60 samples)
Min Avg Max
9.02 MC Read 15.9 18.8
8.41 MC Write 16.7 19.5
11.1 MC Mixed 15.3 16.7
45.6% 16 GB/s
Min Avg Max
5.3 SC Read 10.9 14.9
4.31 SC Write 11.8 17.1
6.42 SC Mixed 13.8 17.7
34.8% 12.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
70.2 Latency 94.6 182
42.3% 94.6 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 12.9
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 14.1
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.7
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 10.6
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 8
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.6
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 311
13% 311 ns
60 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,527,853 RAM Kits tested

Typical NT4GC64C8HG0NS-CG 2x4GB Builds (Compare 2,369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop 47%
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk



Popular NT4GC64C8HG0NS-CG 2x4GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback