Average Bench: 100% (6th of 115)

Based on 50 user benchmarks.  Model: Unknown TXU16G2M3200C16X 4x16GB

Outstanding average bench

The Unknown TXU16G2M3200C16X 4x16GB averaged 0.4% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Unknown TXU16G2M3200C16X 4x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 39.8GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 36.5GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown TXU16G2M3200C16X 4x16GB is 32.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Unknown TXU16G2M3200C16X 4x16GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 71ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 24.9GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 50 samples)
Min Avg Max
28.4 MC Read 39.8 68.6
19.9 MC Write 36.5 43.3
23.1 MC Mixed 32.2 41.7
103% 36.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
16.9 SC Read 24.9 30.4
19.2 SC Write 35 47.3
24.7 SC Mixed 32.3 39
87.7% 30.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
53.2 Latency 71 94.4
56.3% 71 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 30.7
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 42.7
SC Mixed 34
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 35.6
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 41.2
SC Mixed 32.6
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 41
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 35
106% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 28.5
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 35.9
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 28
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 26.1
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 35.4
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 34.3
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 25.8
88% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 27
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 33.7
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 31.3
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 27.5
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 20.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 31
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 30.4
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 88
45% 88 ns
50 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,036,638 RAM Kits tested

Typical TXU16G2M3200C16X 4x16GB Builds (Compare 4,198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z590 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $764

Popular TXU16G2M3200C16X 4x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback