Unknown

HMAA4GS6CJR8N-XN 2x31.5GB

HMAA4GS6CJR8N-XN 2x31.5GB
BENCHMARKS (427)
MKT (0%)
BUILDS
(0)

Effective Speed +3% Effective Speed 3%Average Score +4% MC Read 0%, MC Write 10%, MC Mixed 2%Peak Score -15%MC Read -19%, MC Write -10%, MC Mixed -16%Value & Sentiment User Rating -12%, Market Share -∞%Nice To Haves +9% SC Read -11%, SC Write 37%, SC Mixed -20%, SC Read -36%, SC Write 14%, SC Mixed -19%, Latency -32%, Latency -25%, Age 175%

Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB

Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB

Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB

Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB

Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB

Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

Average Bench: 92.1% (17^th of 115)

Based on 427 user benchmarks. Model: Unknown HMAA4GS6CJR8N-XN 2x31.5GB

Poor: 77%Average: 92.1% Great: 103%

Popular builds with this RAM

Excellent average bench

The Unknown HMAA4GS6CJR8N-XN 2x31.5GB averaged just 7.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Unknown HMAA4GS6CJR8N-XN 2x31.5GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 38.2GB/s

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 36.5GB/s

See where your RAM ranks →

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown HMAA4GS6CJR8N-XN 2x31.5GB is 26.6%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Unknown HMAA4GS6CJR8N-XN 2x31.5GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 96.7ns

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 17.5GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 427 samples)

Rank 1792.1%

Min	Avg	Max
28.4	MC Read 35.1	39.6
28.5	MC Write 36.5	41.2
24.4	MC Mixed 30.6	34.9
97.3% 34.1 GB/s

Min	Avg	Max
13.3	SC Read 17.5	19.8
26.1	SC Write 38.2	45.4
14.5	SC Mixed 21.1	28.1
73.1% 25.6 GB/s

Min	Avg	Max
68.8	Latency 96.7	140
41.4% 96.7 ns

User Benchmarks

Bench

Multi core

Single core

Latency

The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%

USA-User, 2 months ago.

2 of 4 slots used

63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz

87.3% Excellent

MC Read 33.9

MC Write 32.9

MC Mixed 31.4

94% 32.7 GB/s

SC Read 16.4

SC Write 34.2

SC Mixed 17.7

65% 22.8 GB/s

Latency 108

37% 108 ns

USA-User, 1 month ago.

2 of 2 slots used

63GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz

82.6% Excellent

MC Read 31.2

MC Write 31.6

MC Mixed 25.1

84% 29.3 GB/s

SC Read 17.5

SC Write 34.1

SC Mixed 25.4

73% 25.7 GB/s

Latency 69.6

58% 69.6 ns

USA-User, 1 month ago.

2 of 2 slots used

63GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz

80.9% Excellent

MC Read 30.3

MC Write 31.6

MC Mixed 26.7

84% 29.5 GB/s

SC Read 13

SC Write 30.3

SC Mixed 20.3

61% 21.2 GB/s

Latency 70.2

57% 70.2 ns

USA-User, 1 month ago.

2 of 4 slots used

63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz

74.7% Very good

MC Read 28.2

MC Write 30.4

MC Mixed 24.6

79% 27.7 GB/s

SC Read 14.5

SC Write 27.5

SC Mixed 17.4

57% 19.8 GB/s

Latency 106

38% 106 ns

USA-User, 2 months ago.

2 of 2 slots used

63GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz

74.1% Very good

MC Read 29.8

MC Write 26

MC Mixed 24.8

77% 26.9 GB/s

SC Read 13.9

SC Write 24.7

SC Mixed 19.5

55% 19.4 GB/s

Latency 69.1

58% 69.1 ns

DEU-User, 3 months ago.

2 of 2 slots used

63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz

73.8% Very good

MC Read 27.5

MC Write 29.1

MC Mixed 26.2

79% 27.6 GB/s

SC Read 14.6

SC Write 26.7

SC Mixed 15.9

54% 19.1 GB/s

Latency 116

34% 116 ns

CAN-User, 3 months ago.

2 of 2 slots used

63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz

72.3% Very good

MC Read 27.7

MC Write 27.4

MC Mixed 27.5

79% 27.5 GB/s

SC Read 13.1

SC Write 23.2

SC Mixed 13

47% 16.4 GB/s

Latency 122

33% 122 ns

SWE-User, 16 days ago.

2 of 2 slots used

63GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz

43% Average

MC Read 16.1

MC Write 14.2

MC Mixed 18.3

46% 16.2 GB/s

SC Read 7.6

SC Write 13.3

SC Mixed 7.4

27% 9.43 GB/s

Latency 146

27% 146 ns

USA-User, 3 months ago.

2 of 2 slots used

63GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz

36.1% Below average

MC Read 16.6

MC Write 11.1

MC Mixed 14.5

40% 14.1 GB/s

SC Read 4.4

SC Write 7.4

SC Mixed 6.5

17% 6.1 GB/s

Latency 195

20% 195 ns

427 MORE »

Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,035,002 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical HMAA4GS6CJR8N-XN 2x31.5GB Builds (Compare 1,894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Dell XPS 17 9710

CPU
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples	1,143x
Core i9-11900HIntelBench 89%, 6,494 samples	493x
Core i9-11980HKIntelBench 93%, 1,108 samples	232x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples	1,113x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	591x
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPUNvidiaBench 55%, 38,648 samples	154x

SSD
PC711 SK hynix 1TBNvmeBench 277%, 3,587 samples	341x
Micron 2300 1024GBNvmeBench 223%, 2,439 samples	279x
PC711 SK hynix 512GBNvmeBench 250%, 2,402 samples	132x

RAM
HMAA4GS6CJR8N-XN 2x31.5GBUnknownBench 92%, 427 samples	105x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular HMAA4GS6CJR8N-XN 2x31.5GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. ^[RAMPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ

What is the UBM value for money rating?

What is UBM Effective Speed?

Thunderbolt speed?

Are USB 3.0 cables different?

USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?

Why buy USB 3.0 today?

USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?

Graphics Cards

How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?

What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?

What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?

What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?

Memory Kits

What is the RAM value for money rating?

What is the effective RAM speed index?

What is the system memory latency ladder?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Unknown

HMAA4GS6CJR8N-XN 2x31.5GB

Average Bench: 92.1% (17^th of 115)

Popular builds with this RAM

Excellent average bench

Strengths

Good consistency

Weaknesses

Average Bench

Market Share (See Leaders)

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

System: Dell XPS 17 9710

Popular HMAA4GS6CJR8N-XN 2x31.5GB systems:

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Group Test Results

Comments

Speed Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Unknown

HMAA4GS6CJR8N-XN 2x31.5GB

Average Bench: 92.1% (17th of 115)

Popular builds with this RAM

Excellent average bench

Strengths

Good consistency

Weaknesses

Average Bench

Market Share (See Leaders)

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

System: Dell XPS 17 9710

Popular HMAA4GS6CJR8N-XN 2x31.5GB systems:

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Group Test Results

Share a related link

Comments

Speed Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback

Average Bench: 92.1% (17^th of 115)