Average Bench: 94.3% (32nd of 132)

Based on 6,580 user benchmarks.  Model: Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 4x16GB

Excellent average bench

The Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 4x16GB averaged just 5.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 4x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 38.8GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 32.7GB/s

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 4x16GB is 63%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 4x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 78.8ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 24.3GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 6,580 samples)
Min Avg Max
23.2 MC Read 38.8 61.5
16 MC Write 31.2 44
21.5 MC Mixed 32.7 43
97.7% 34.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
15.2 SC Read 24.3 31.8
15.6 SC Write 28.9 48.9
19.8 SC Mixed 30.8 41.8
80% 28 GB/s
Min Avg Max
58.8 Latency 78.8 106
50.8% 78.8 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 43
MC Mixed 31.8
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 33
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2000 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 41
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 39.6
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 28.6
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 36.4
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 35.7
SC Mixed 29.9
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 30.8
105% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 42.2
SC Mixed 30.3
88% 31 GB/s
Latency 57.7
69% 57.7 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22.4
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 23
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 24
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 24.3
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 88
45% 88 ns
6,580 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,511,227 RAM Kits tested

Typical CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 4x16GB Builds (Compare 9,308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 272%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4 - $409

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,455

Popular CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 4x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback