Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Corsair

CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 CMK16GX4M1E3200C16 CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 32GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q1 2021.

Average Bench: 66.9% (104th of 132)

Based on 10 user benchmarks.  Model: Corsair CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 CMK16GX4M1E3200C16 CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 32GB
Poor: 34%Average: 66.9% Great: 78%

Popular builds with this RAM

Above average average bench

The Corsair CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 CMK16GX4M1E3200C16 CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 32GB averaged 33.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 24.8GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 24.5GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Corsair CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 CMK16GX4M1E3200C16 CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 32GB is 44.9%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Corsair CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 CMK16GX4M1E3200C16 CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 32GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 84.1ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 17.2GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 10 samples)
Rank 10466.9%
Min Avg Max
11.6 MC Read 24.8 31.3
13.3 MC Write 23.9 30.5
11.3 MC Mixed 21.9 29.5
67.2% 23.5 GB/s
Min Avg Max
8.9 SC Read 17.2 22.5
10.5 SC Write 24.5 33.7
9.8 SC Mixed 21.8 29.9
60.5% 21.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
65.4 Latency 84.1 173
47.6% 84.1 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
78.4% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 28
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 29.9
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
76.5% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 29.5
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 25.5
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
68% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 23.8
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 20.6
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
38.5% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 11.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,966,139 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 CMK16GX4M1E3200C16 CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 32GB Builds (Compare 1,030 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA - $240

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel  $143Bench 81%, 588,978 samples698x
Core i7-7700KIntel  $148Bench 84%, 712,312 samples123x
Core i5-6600KIntel  $98Bench 72%, 342,244 samples79x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples171x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $170Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples146x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples77x
SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples61x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung  $150Bench 199%, 40,327 samples42x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung  $330Bench 223%, 54,978 samples35x
RAM
CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 CMK16GX4M1E3200C16 CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 32GBCorsairBench 67%, 10 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $664

Popular CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 CMK16GX4M1E3200C16 CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 32GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 3 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback