Average Bench: 91.5% (18th of 115)

Based on 188 user benchmarks.  Model: PNY 16GF2X16QFHH36-135-K 2x16GB

Excellent average bench

The PNY 16GF2X16QFHH36-135-K 2x16GB averaged just 8.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the PNY 16GF2X16QFHH36-135-K 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 38.2GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 32.6GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the PNY 16GF2X16QFHH36-135-K 2x16GB is 44.3%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the PNY 16GF2X16QFHH36-135-K 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 77.4ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 24.9GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 188 samples)
Min Avg Max
25 MC Read 38.2 59.9
18 MC Write 27.9 40.6
23.1 MC Mixed 32.6 40.1
93.9% 32.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
15.9 SC Read 24.9 31.9
18.3 SC Write 27.8 45.8
18.3 SC Mixed 31.8 39.8
80.4% 28.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
59.5 Latency 77.4 104
51.7% 77.4 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 119
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 20.4
151% 52.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 22.1
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 56.9
70% 56.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 29.4
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 45.3
SC Mixed 30.1
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 46.7
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 35.6
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 28
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 48.7
82% 48.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 36.8
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 37.6
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 31.6
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 29.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 30.7
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 24.4
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 24.8
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 24.2
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 31.8
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 32.5
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 29.7
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 27.7
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
188 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,008,346 RAM Kits tested

Typical 16GF2X16QFHH36-135-K 2x16GB Builds (Compare 25,772 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $892

Popular 16GF2X16QFHH36-135-K 2x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback