Average Bench: 44% (102nd of 115)

Based on 1,443 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 1x16GB

Below average average bench

The Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 1x16GB averaged 56.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 17GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 16.6GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 1x16GB is 25.8%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 1x16GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 136ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 11.9GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 1,443 samples)
Min Avg Max
8.77 MC Read 15.6 19.8
12 MC Write 17 20.5
9 MC Mixed 13.5 16.3
43.9% 15.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
3.5 SC Read 11.9 17.5
8.4 SC Write 16.6 21.8
4.47 SC Mixed 12.6 17.6
39.2% 13.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
67.3 Latency 136 313
29.5% 136 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 14.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 16.6
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 17.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 14
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 16
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 13.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 15.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 16
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 12.6
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 11.7
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 10.6
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 10.7
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
1,443 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 63,772,206 RAM Kits tested.

Typical CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 1x16GB Builds (Compare 2,861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G770

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $43

Popular CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 1x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2023 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $310Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12400F $150Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $397Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i5-12600K $215Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback