Average Bench: 98.9% (7th of 115)

Based on 932 user benchmarks.  Model: Corsair CMU64GX4M4C3200C16 4x16GB

Excellent average bench

The Corsair CMU64GX4M4C3200C16 4x16GB averaged just 1.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Corsair CMU64GX4M4C3200C16 4x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 39.6GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 37GB/s

Very poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Corsair CMU64GX4M4C3200C16 4x16GB is 71.9%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Corsair CMU64GX4M4C3200C16 4x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 18.2GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 75.5ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 932 samples)
Min Avg Max
23.9 MC Read 37 61.3
23.8 MC Write 39.6 69.4
21.9 MC Mixed 33.9 53.4
105% 36.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
7.9 SC Read 18.2 28.3
17.9 SC Write 30.2 45.4
10.8 SC Mixed 24.9 37.4
69.8% 24.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
53.3 Latency 75.5 120
53% 75.5 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 49.1
MC Write 49.6
MC Mixed 41.1
133% 46.6 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 29.6
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 28.8
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 58.1
69% 58.1 ns
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 50.3
MC Mixed 31.7
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 10.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.5
94% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 38.8
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 26.7
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 22.5
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 26.5
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 22.5
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 26.1
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 26.8
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22.7
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 23.7
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 17.1
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 10
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
932 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 66,998,710 RAM Kits tested

Typical CMU64GX4M4C3200C16 4x16GB Builds (Compare 1,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $290

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $1,515

Popular CMU64GX4M4C3200C16 4x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback