Average Bench: 72.9% (92nd of 132)

Based on 2,666 user benchmarks.  Model: Hynix HMCG78MEBSA092N 1x16GB

Good average bench

The Hynix HMCG78MEBSA092N 1x16GB averaged 27.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.


Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 28GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 26.3GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Hynix HMCG78MEBSA092N 1x16GB is 22.7%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Hynix HMCG78MEBSA092N 1x16GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. Physical RAM Latency 102ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 18.1GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 2,666 samples)
Min Avg Max
22.3 MC Read 28 32.3
21.3 MC Write 26.3 30.5
21.5 MC Mixed 25.4 28.7
75.9% 26.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
12 SC Read 18.1 24.3
17.9 SC Write 25.3 30.4
14.4 SC Mixed 20 24.5
60.4% 21.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
82.6 Latency 102 145
39.1% 102 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 27
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 20
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 23.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 19.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 23
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 18.2
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 22.3
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 22.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 23
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 22.7
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
2,666 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,528,097 RAM Kits tested

Typical HMCG78MEBSA092N 1x16GB Builds (Compare 978 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 140%
Desktop 108%
Workstation 147%

System: Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VI_GU604VI


Popular HMCG78MEBSA092N 1x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $402
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback