Average Bench: 174% (1st of 115)

Based on 3,046 user benchmarks.  Model: Kingston KF556C40-32 2x31.5GB

Outstanding average bench

The Kingston KF556C40-32 2x31.5GB averaged 74.3% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Kingston KF556C40-32 2x31.5GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 72.5GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 65.8GB/s

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Kingston KF556C40-32 2x31.5GB is 63.9%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Kingston KF556C40-32 2x31.5GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 81ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 28.3GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 3,046 samples)
Min Avg Max
52.8 MC Read 72.5 89.6
52.5 MC Write 65.8 75.6
51.3 MC Mixed 64.1 73.7
193% 67.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
17.9 SC Read 28.3 57.2
32.6 SC Write 52 66.3
26.5 SC Mixed 36.9 58.2
112% 39 GB/s
Min Avg Max
66.3 Latency 81 96.6
49.4% 81 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 148
MC Write 52.6
MC Mixed 64.6
253% 88.5 GB/s
SC Read 43.6
SC Write 56.8
SC Mixed 49.1
142% 49.8 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 78.6
MC Write 74.7
MC Mixed 72.2
215% 75.2 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 53.5
SC Mixed 36.8
111% 38.8 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 78
MC Write 74.9
MC Mixed 71.7
214% 74.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 53.2
SC Mixed 36.5
109% 38.2 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 77.8
MC Write 74.5
MC Mixed 71.4
213% 74.6 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 53.2
SC Mixed 34.8
105% 36.7 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 75.8
MC Write 62.9
MC Mixed 67.5
196% 68.7 GB/s
SC Read 59
SC Write 63.2
SC Mixed 57.5
171% 59.9 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 76
MC Write 73.7
MC Mixed 70.3
210% 73.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 53.1
SC Mixed 35.3
106% 37.2 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 64.8
MC Write 66
MC Mixed 60.9
183% 63.9 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 51.7
SC Mixed 30.1
96% 33.6 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 64
MC Write 64.9
MC Mixed 61.3
181% 63.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 49.5
SC Mixed 30.6
96% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 33.9
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 26.4
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
3,046 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 66,998,710 RAM Kits tested

Typical KF556C40-32 2x31.5GB Builds (Compare 8,926 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX - $215

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $1,408

Popular KF556C40-32 2x31.5GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback