Average Bench: 175% (1st of 115)

Based on 492 user benchmarks.  Model: Corsair CMT64GX5M2B5600C40 2x31.5GB

Outstanding average bench

The Corsair CMT64GX5M2B5600C40 2x31.5GB averaged 75.2% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Corsair CMT64GX5M2B5600C40 2x31.5GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 72.4GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 66.4GB/s

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Corsair CMT64GX5M2B5600C40 2x31.5GB is 62.7%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Corsair CMT64GX5M2B5600C40 2x31.5GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 80.5ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 28.5GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 492 samples)
Min Avg Max
52.9 MC Read 72.4 88.2
52.9 MC Write 66.4 77.4
51.3 MC Mixed 64.5 73.4
194% 67.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
19 SC Read 28.5 56.3
44.9 SC Write 52.4 65.7
28.7 SC Mixed 37.4 57.4
113% 39.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
68.6 Latency 80.5 94.1
49.7% 80.5 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 138
MC Write 54.8
MC Mixed 69.3
250% 87.4 GB/s
SC Read 36.2
SC Write 56.2
SC Mixed 43.4
129% 45.3 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6400 MHz
MC Read 87.1
MC Write 81.4
MC Mixed 80.4
237% 83 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 51.9
SC Mixed 35.6
106% 37.2 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 80.2
MC Write 76
MC Mixed 74.8
220% 77 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 53.6
SC Mixed 38.5
114% 39.9 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 79.4
MC Write 75.5
MC Mixed 74.5
218% 76.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 53.5
SC Mixed 37.5
109% 38.2 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 77.8
MC Write 75.7
MC Mixed 71.2
214% 74.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 53.3
SC Mixed 35.3
106% 37.1 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 64.4
MC Write 66.4
MC Mixed 62
184% 64.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 46.8
SC Mixed 32.7
97% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 61.4
MC Write 62.9
MC Mixed 58.6
174% 61 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 48.5
SC Mixed 32.5
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 51.9
MC Write 52.3
MC Mixed 53.9
151% 52.7 GB/s
SC Read 49.5
SC Write 55.4
SC Mixed 50.2
148% 51.7 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 55
MC Write 58.2
MC Mixed 57.2
162% 56.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 46.5
SC Mixed 30.4
94% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
492 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,004,935 RAM Kits tested

Typical CMT64GX5M2B5600C40 2x31.5GB Builds (Compare 3,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $2,531

Popular CMT64GX5M2B5600C40 2x31.5GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback