Average Bench: 175% (8th of 132)

Based on 2,095 user benchmarks.  Model: Corsair CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 2x16GB

Outstanding average bench

The Corsair CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 2x16GB averaged 75.2% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Corsair CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 69.8GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 62.8GB/s

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Corsair CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 2x16GB is 65.7%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Corsair CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 69.7ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 47.5GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 2,095 samples)
Min Avg Max
50.6 MC Read 69.8 86.5
49.6 MC Write 61.6 75.2
49.6 MC Mixed 62.8 74.7
185% 64.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
19.8 SC Read 47.5 65.2
47.2 SC Write 58 71.6
28.5 SC Mixed 51 64
149% 52.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
45.1 Latency 69.7 91
57.4% 69.7 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
MC Read 70.4
MC Write 61.7
MC Mixed 61.1
184% 64.4 GB/s
SC Read 49.9
SC Write 65.3
SC Mixed 56.4
163% 57.2 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 74.6
MC Write 52.4
MC Mixed 56.6
175% 61.2 GB/s
SC Read 50.8
SC Write 52.2
SC Mixed 51.1
147% 51.4 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 69.6
MC Write 56.6
MC Mixed 61.1
178% 62.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 48.8
SC Mixed 29.4
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 56.8
MC Write 52.9
MC Mixed 51.9
154% 53.9 GB/s
SC Read 52.1
SC Write 55.9
SC Mixed 52.2
153% 53.4 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 54.9
MC Write 51.3
MC Mixed 51.5
150% 52.6 GB/s
SC Read 51
SC Write 51
SC Mixed 47.6
142% 49.9 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 37.4
111% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 43.2
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 41.3
118% 41.2 GB/s
Latency 49.1
82% 49.1 ns
2,095 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,524,483 RAM Kits tested

Typical CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 2x16GB Builds (Compare 9,611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX - $205

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $1,427

Popular CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 2x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback