Average Bench: 78.2% (61st of 115)

Based on 2,859 user benchmarks.  Model: G.SKILL F4-2400C15-8GFT 2x8GB

Good average bench

The G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB averaged 21.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 30.6GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 27.5GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB is 44%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 86.2ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 19.9GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 2,859 samples)
Min Avg Max
16.7 MC Read 30.6 35.2
15.6 MC Write 27.5 33.5
14.5 MC Mixed 26.4 31.1
80.4% 28.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
13.4 SC Read 19.9 26
14.8 SC Write 26.7 33.1
14.8 SC Mixed 23.8 29.7
67% 23.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
60.9 Latency 86.2 108
46.4% 86.2 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2800 MHz clocked @ 1400 MHz
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 28.8
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 24.2
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 29.3
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 26.4
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 29.2
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 23.4
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 22.5
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 24.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 57.1
70% 57.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 22.6
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 24.2
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 28.7
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 19.6
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 20.7
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 19.5
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 257
16% 257 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 25.1
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 14
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 15.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
2,859 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 66,998,306 RAM Kits tested

Typical F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB Builds (Compare 4,287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350-PLUS - $92

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $399

Popular F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback