Average Bench: 70.7% (80th of 115)

Based on 1,088 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FHP 2x8GB

Good average bench

The Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FHP 2x8GB averaged 29.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 26.5GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 26.2GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FHP 2x8GB is 40.5%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FHP 2x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 16.1GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 81.9ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 1,088 samples)
Min Avg Max
14.4 MC Read 25.8 30.9
14.1 MC Write 26.5 30
13.4 MC Mixed 23.2 27.9
72% 25.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
10.5 SC Read 16.1 21.4
14.7 SC Write 26.2 31.7
13.6 SC Mixed 21.5 26.2
60.8% 21.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
67.3 Latency 81.9 108
48.8% 81.9 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 25.5
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 20.6
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 28
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 25.2
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 24.4
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 22.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 19.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.8
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 18.8
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 27.5
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 26.9
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 22
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 18.7
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 22
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 20
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 21.4
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 94
42% 94 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 20.1
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 16.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
1,088 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,011,805 RAM Kits tested

Typical CT8G4DFD8213.C16FHP 2x8GB Builds (Compare 16,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) - $143

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $526

Popular CT8G4DFD8213.C16FHP 2x8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback