TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung

M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB

▲ 505 ▼

Release date ≤ Q4 2015.

Average Bench: 23.2% (108th of 108)

Based on 27,436 user benchmarks.  Model: Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB
Poor: 12%Average: 23.2% Great: 32%

Popular builds with this RAM

Very poor average bench

The Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB averaged 76.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 139ns
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 8.25GB/s

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB is just 20%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 5.99GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Mixed IO Bench 6.17GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 27,436 samples)
Rank 10823.2%
Min Avg Max
3.8 MC Read 8.25 11
3.5 MC Write 7.88 10.7
3.86 MC Mixed 6.96 9
22% 7.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
1.56 SC Read 5.99 9.9
2.7 SC Write 6.71 11
1.3 SC Mixed 6.17 9.9
18% 6.29 GB/s
Min Avg Max
68 Latency 139 255
28.7% 139 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
32.4% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 8.7
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
31.3% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
30.6% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
30.5% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9.9
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
29.4% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
25.5% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7.2
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
17% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.47 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 6.1
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
15.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 4.8
16% 5.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.5
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 221
18% 221 ns
27,436 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 23,323,678 RAM Kits tested.

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB Builds (Compare 23,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

CPU
A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)AMDBench 24%, 16,313 samples3,891x
A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 29%, 7,116 samples2,434x
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 30%, 28,016 samples2,256x
GPU
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 26,284 samples3,891x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 148,243 samples3,565x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 184,491 samples3,166x
SSD
SD8SNAT-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 64%, 1,765 samples279x
A400 240GBKingston  $32Bench 63%, 122,004 samples224x
MZNLN256HMHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 91%, 2,460 samples138x
RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 27,436 samples1,915x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop Workstation

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 4 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB

108 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $384Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Test your PC Build a PC
Can You Run It?
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback