Average Bench: 40.3% (99th of 108)

Based on 2,815 user benchmarks.  Model: Ramaxel RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GB

Below average average bench

The Ramaxel RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GB averaged 59.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 82.6ns
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 15.6GB/s

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Ramaxel RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GB is just 13.9%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Ramaxel RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 11GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 11.6GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 2,815 samples)
Min Avg Max
12.3 MC Read 15.6 17.9
10.8 MC Write 13.9 15.9
9.4 MC Mixed 11 12.4
38.6% 13.5 GB/s
Min Avg Max
6.49 SC Read 11.6 13.9
8 SC Write 13.6 16.6
7.85 SC Mixed 12.6 14.9
36% 12.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
60.7 Latency 82.6 120
48.4% 82.6 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 11.8
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.7
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 16.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 96.5
42% 96.5 ns
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 16
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.2
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 11.2
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 9.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 12.2
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 10.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
2,815 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 21,183,027 RAM Kits tested.

Typical RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GB Builds (Compare 6,654 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Lenovo 81FV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Poor (edit your comment) Add link

12 months ago.

Legion Y530, only 1x8GB. It aint strong and lags a bit but in general just isn't the best, it'll get work done but should go in low end laptops that don't need to much strain from programming, graphic design, or gamming.


Your
opinion?
108 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 580 $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $334Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback