Average Bench: 70.4% (81st of 115)

Based on 111 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT4G4SFS824A.M8FB 2x4GB

Good average bench

The Crucial CT4G4SFS824A.M8FB 2x4GB averaged 29.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 29.1GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 26.3GB/s

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT4G4SFS824A.M8FB 2x4GB is 61.8%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Crucial CT4G4SFS824A.M8FB 2x4GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 13.9GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 88ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 111 samples)
Min Avg Max
12.2 MC Read 26.3 49.6
9.9 MC Write 29.1 51.6
12.3 MC Mixed 21.3 26.4
73% 25.5 GB/s
Min Avg Max
3 SC Read 13.9 18.8
4.8 SC Write 24.3 34.5
4.4 SC Mixed 18.8 25.2
54.3% 19 GB/s
Min Avg Max
62.8 Latency 88 170
45.5% 88 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 44.4
MC Mixed 22
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 16.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 20.6
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 20.7
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 20.4
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 20.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 20.2
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 12.2
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 12.2
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 1.8
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
111 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 66,987,534 RAM Kits tested

Typical CT4G4SFS824A.M8FB 2x4GB Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NB F650 GOLD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular CT4G4SFS824A.M8FB 2x4GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback