Average Bench: 46.3% (100th of 113)

Based on 807 user benchmarks.  Model: Kingmax FLFF65F-C8KL9 2x4GB

Below average average bench

The Kingmax FLFF65F-C8KL9 2x4GB averaged 53.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 76.9ns
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 16.5GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Kingmax FLFF65F-C8KL9 2x4GB is 25.4%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Kingmax FLFF65F-C8KL9 2x4GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 12.2GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 13.5GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 807 samples)
Min Avg Max
9.28 MC Read 16.5 19.1
7.2 MC Write 16.2 19.5
8.38 MC Mixed 15.1 17.1
45.5% 15.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
6.5 SC Read 12.2 15.5
5.9 SC Write 13.5 18.1
7.78 SC Mixed 13.7 17.1
37.6% 13.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
62.3 Latency 76.9 104
52% 76.9 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 19.9
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.4
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 14.4
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.5
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 9.2
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
807 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 45,890,720 RAM Kits tested.

Typical FLFF65F-C8KL9 2x4GB Builds (Compare 820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-EIH61CE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $109

Popular FLFF65F-C8KL9 2x4GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2021 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

113 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback