Average Bench: 82.6% (45th of 115)

Based on 405 user benchmarks.  Model: Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GB

Very good average bench

The Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GB averaged just 17.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 34.6GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 32.5GB/s

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GB is 61%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 11.8GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Mixed IO Bench 12.2GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 405 samples)
Min Avg Max
18.6 MC Read 34.6 46
15.8 MC Write 32.5 42.1
15.6 MC Mixed 29.8 39
92.3% 32.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
9.83 SC Read 13.6 16
4.73 SC Write 11.8 18.2
5.5 SC Mixed 12.2 20.3
35.8% 12.5 GB/s
Min Avg Max
66.2 Latency 80.1 135
49.9% 80.1 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
MC Read 52.2
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 42.9
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 20.2
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 44.2
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 35.8
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 19.7
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 37.3
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 34.5
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 32.5
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.1
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 19.6
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 20.3
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.8
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
4 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.1
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
405 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 66,989,244 RAM Kits tested

Typical M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GB Builds (Compare 936 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

System: Huanan Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130

Popular M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback