Average Bench: 73.6% (71st of 113)

Based on 863 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 2x8GB

Good average bench

The Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 2x8GB averaged 26.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 29.3GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 27.6GB/s

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 2x8GB is 54%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 2x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 15.3GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 85.3ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 863 samples)
Min Avg Max
16.6 MC Read 27.6 34.2
18.5 MC Write 29.3 49.4
18.4 MC Mixed 22.9 27.8
75.9% 26.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
7.5 SC Read 15.3 20.1
11.1 SC Write 26.3 36.7
11.3 SC Mixed 20.9 25.3
59.5% 20.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
61.7 Latency 85.3 148
46.9% 85.3 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 47.3
MC Write 49.8
MC Mixed 26.5
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 40.9
SC Mixed 21.6
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 27.1
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.3
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 22.6
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 19.5
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 21.8
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 21.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 21.3
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 17.7
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 10.8
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 12.6
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 199
20% 199 ns
863 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 30,993,124 RAM Kits tested.

Typical CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 2x8GB Builds (Compare 925 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel NUC8BEB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $100

Popular CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 2x8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2020 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

113 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $315Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback