Samsung

M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB

M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
BENCHMARKS (69,946)
MKT (0.3%)
BUILDS
(2)

Effective Speed -4%Effective Speed -4%Average Score -5%MC Read -4%, MC Write 0%, MC Mixed -13%Peak Score -13%MC Read -13%, MC Write -12%, MC Mixed -15%Value & Sentiment +1% User Rating -13%, Market Share 15%Nice To Haves +1% SC Read -13%, SC Write 19%, SC Mixed -16%, SC Read -22%, SC Write 8%, SC Mixed -17%, Latency -16%, Latency -7%, Age 73%

Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB

Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB

Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB

Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB

Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB

Average Bench: 85.8% (29^th of 115)

Based on 69,946 user benchmarks. Model: Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB

Poor: 64%Average: 85.8% Great: 103%

Popular builds with this RAM

Very good average bench

The Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB averaged just 14.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 33.8GB/s

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 33.3GB/s

See where your RAM ranks →

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB is 38.8%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 85.1ns

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 17.1GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 69,946 samples)

Rank 2985.8%

Min	Avg	Max
24	MC Read 33.8	41.7
23.1	MC Write 33.3	40.6
20.5	MC Mixed 26.7	35.2
89.3% 31.3 GB/s

Min	Avg	Max
9.8	SC Read 17.1	22.1
16.3	SC Write 33.1	43
12.1	SC Mixed 21.8	28.7
68.6% 24 GB/s

Min	Avg	Max
58.6	Latency 85.1	130
47% 85.1 ns

User Benchmarks

Bench

Multi core

Single core

Latency

The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%

UKR-User, 5 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz

101% Outstanding

MC Read 40.6

MC Write 36.6

MC Mixed 35.1

107% 37.4 GB/s

SC Read 19.8

SC Write 36.5

SC Mixed 22.2

75% 26.2 GB/s

Latency 79.4

50% 79.4 ns

USA-User, 9 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz

99.2% Outstanding

MC Read 40.8

MC Write 37.2

MC Mixed 34.6

107% 37.5 GB/s

SC Read 19.9

SC Write 28

SC Mixed 20.1

65% 22.7 GB/s

Latency 76.8

52% 76.8 ns

TUR-User, 8 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz

98.4% Outstanding

MC Read 39.7

MC Write 38.8

MC Mixed 31.3

105% 36.6 GB/s

SC Read 18.1

SC Write 43.3

SC Mixed 19.3

77% 26.9 GB/s

Latency 96.6

41% 96.6 ns

USA-User, 4 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz

85.6% Excellent

MC Read 33.4

MC Write 34.2

MC Mixed 23.9

87% 30.5 GB/s

SC Read 16.5

SC Write 37.6

SC Mixed 25

75% 26.4 GB/s

Latency 69.3

58% 69.3 ns

GBR-User, 9 hrs ago.

2 of 8 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz

85.5% Excellent

MC Read 33.6

MC Write 35.3

MC Mixed 26.6

91% 31.8 GB/s

SC Read 15.8

SC Write 33.1

SC Mixed 19

65% 22.6 GB/s

Latency 100

40% 100 ns

MAR-User, 5 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz

80.5% Excellent

MC Read 29.2

MC Write 26.1

MC Mixed 28.6

80% 28 GB/s

SC Read 23.3

SC Write 37.6

SC Mixed 27.5

84% 29.5 GB/s

Latency 88.3

45% 88.3 ns

USA-User, 7 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz

69.3% Good

MC Read 28

MC Write 24.8

MC Mixed 21.5

71% 24.8 GB/s

SC Read 14.2

SC Write 24.3

SC Mixed 22.2

58% 20.2 GB/s

Latency 77.5

52% 77.5 ns

ITA-User, 3 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz

60.4% Good

MC Read 27.4

MC Write 23.4

MC Mixed 20.3

68% 23.7 GB/s

SC Read 5.9

SC Write 13.2

SC Mixed 8.3

26% 9.13 GB/s

Latency 110

36% 110 ns

NPL-User, 8 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz

14.1% Very poor

MC Read 4.2

MC Write 4.4

MC Mixed 6.2

14% 4.93 GB/s

SC Read 3

SC Write 1.6

SC Mixed 0.7

5% 1.77 GB/s

Latency 139

29% 139 ns

69,946 MORE »

Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 66,996,658 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB Builds (Compare 6,050 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-53

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	4,141x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples	995x
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples	851x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	2,972x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	1,132x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	801x

SSD
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 179%, 2,900 samples	979x
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1014 1TBWDCBench 219%, 2,501 samples	628x
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-256G-1014 256GBWDCBench 153%, 1,070 samples	541x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	1,908x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. ^[RAMPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

Comments

Added n/a ago.

USA-User

level
9,832

Liked (edit your comment) Add link

20 months ago.

Gamejang

level
162

Average

2 years ago.

I have this for 2020 ROG Strix G17. Not bad. Able to do it's job.

Your
opinion?

▲Like ▼Dislike

Ready to retire
Age: 5 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ

What is the UBM value for money rating?

What is UBM Effective Speed?

Thunderbolt speed?

Are USB 3.0 cables different?

USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?

Why buy USB 3.0 today?

USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?

Graphics Cards

How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?

What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?

What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?

What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?

Memory Kits

What is the RAM value for money rating?

What is the effective RAM speed index?

What is the system memory latency ladder?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Samsung

M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB

Average Bench: 85.8% (29th of 115)

Popular builds with this RAM

Very good average bench

Strengths

Above average consistency

Weaknesses

Average Bench

Market Share (See Leaders)

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

System: Acer Predator PH315-53

Popular M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB systems:

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Group Test Results

Share a related link

Comments

Liked (edit your comment) Add link

Average

Speed Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback

Average Bench: 85.8% (29^th of 115)