Average Bench: 113% (2nd of 115)

Based on 14 user benchmarks.  Model: Hynix HMA82GR7CJR4N-VK 8x16GB
Poor: 79%Average: 113% Great: 131%

Popular builds with this RAM

Outstanding average bench

The Hynix HMA82GR7CJR4N-VK 8x16GB averaged 12.6% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Hynix HMA82GR7CJR4N-VK 8x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 58.9GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 42.1GB/s

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Hynix HMA82GR7CJR4N-VK 8x16GB is 52.3%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Hynix HMA82GR7CJR4N-VK 8x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 8.73GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Mixed IO Bench 9.68GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 14 samples)
Min Avg Max
31 MC Read 58.9 128
10.6 MC Write 38.6 114
14.3 MC Mixed 42.1 137
133% 46.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
9.7 SC Read 11.9 13
6.1 SC Write 8.73 21.4
6.2 SC Mixed 9.68 24.2
28.8% 10.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
79.8 Latency 105 160
37.9% 105 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 128
MC Write 114
MC Mixed 137
361% 126 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 24.2
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
8 of 24 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 67.9
MC Write 51
MC Mixed 44.7
156% 54.5 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
8 of 24 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 65.8
MC Write 49.1
MC Mixed 38.4
146% 51.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 54.6
MC Write 46.4
MC Mixed 39.5
134% 46.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.1
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
8 of 24 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 67.2
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 41.6
125% 43.6 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.5
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
8 of 24 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 41
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 30.9
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
8 of 24 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 33
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 7.2
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
8 of 24 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 31.1
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
8 of 24 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 31
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 14.3
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.2
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
14 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,003,398 RAM Kits tested

Typical HMA82GR7CJR4N-VK 8x16GB Builds (Compare 808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: HP Z8 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular HMA82GR7CJR4N-VK 8x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback