Average Bench: 76.8% (63rd of 115)

Based on 240 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.M16FAD 2x8GB

Good average bench

The Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.M16FAD 2x8GB averaged 23.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.M16FAD 2x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 29.3GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 28.9GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.M16FAD 2x8GB is 44.4%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.M16FAD 2x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 16.9GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 69.3ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 240 samples)
Min Avg Max
15.2 MC Read 27.8 32.3
15.2 MC Write 29.3 33.7
13.6 MC Mixed 24.8 29.7
77.9% 27.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
11.5 SC Read 16.9 20.4
15 SC Write 28.9 34.8
13.5 SC Mixed 22.9 27.6
65.5% 22.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
58.9 Latency 69.3 88.1
57.8% 69.3 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 27.3
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 26.7
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 27.9
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 24
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 25.3
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 25.6
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 24.3
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 24.7
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 27.9
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 22.2
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 23.3
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 32.9
SC Mixed 23.5
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 24.4
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 22.9
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 18.4
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.2
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 11.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
240 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,001,010 RAM Kits tested

Typical BLS8G4D240FSB.M16FAD 2x8GB Builds (Compare 13,896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $707

Popular BLS8G4D240FSB.M16FAD 2x8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback