Kingston

9905712-035.A00G 2x16GB

9905712-035.A00G 2x16GB
BENCHMARKS (321)
MKT (0%)
BUILDS
(0)

Effective Speed -8%Effective Speed -8%Average Score -11%MC Read -15%, MC Write -3%, MC Mixed -15%Peak Score -38%MC Read -41%, MC Write -29%, MC Mixed -43%Value & Sentiment User Rating -13%, Market Share -∞%Nice To Haves +3% SC Read -12%, SC Write 18%, SC Mixed -4%, SC Read -25%, SC Write -5%, SC Mixed -20%, Latency -7%, Latency -12%, Age 91%

Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB

Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB

Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB

Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB

Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB

Average Bench: 82.7% (45^th of 115)

Based on 321 user benchmarks. Model: Kingston 9905712-035.A00G 2x16GB

Poor: 64%Average: 82.7% Great: 90%

Popular builds with this RAM

Very good average bench

The Kingston 9905712-035.A00G 2x16GB averaged just 17.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Kingston 9905712-035.A00G 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 32.9GB/s

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 32.3GB/s

See where your RAM ranks →

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Kingston 9905712-035.A00G 2x16GB is 25.8%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Kingston 9905712-035.A00G 2x16GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 17.3GB/s

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 78.4ns

Average Bench

(Based on 321 samples)

Rank 4582.7%

Min	Avg	Max
22.1	MC Read 30.4	33.5
25.3	MC Write 32.3	35.1
22	MC Mixed 26.2	28.4
84.7% 29.6 GB/s

Min	Avg	Max
9.37	SC Read 17.3	21.5
17.9	SC Write 32.9	38
15	SC Mixed 24.4	27.9
71% 24.9 GB/s

Min	Avg	Max
61.5	Latency 78.4	118
51% 78.4 ns

User Benchmarks

Bench

Multi core

Single core

Latency

The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%

POL-User, 1 month ago.

2 of 2 slots used

32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz

88.9% Excellent

MC Read 32.4

MC Write 35.1

MC Mixed 27.3

90% 31.6 GB/s

SC Read 19.1

SC Write 36.9

SC Mixed 27.5

80% 27.8 GB/s

Latency 67.9

59% 67.9 ns

DEU-User, 2 months ago.

2 of 2 slots used

32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz

79.4% Very good

MC Read 31.7

MC Write 33.6

MC Mixed 26.6

88% 30.6 GB/s

SC Read 2.9

SC Write 13.5

SC Mixed 20.1

35% 12.2 GB/s

Latency 65

62% 65 ns

TUR-User, 3 months ago.

2 of 2 slots used

32GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz

78.2% Very good

MC Read 28.4

MC Write 29

MC Mixed 26.4

80% 27.9 GB/s

SC Read 22.1

SC Write 32.9

SC Mixed 23

74% 26 GB/s

Latency 103

39% 103 ns

POL-User, 1 month ago.

2 of 2 slots used

32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz

77.5% Very good

MC Read 28.8

MC Write 30.6

MC Mixed 23.9

79% 27.8 GB/s

SC Read 15.3

SC Write 30

SC Mixed 23.5

66% 22.9 GB/s

Latency 75.5

53% 75.5 ns

CZE-User, 2 months ago.

2 of 2 slots used

32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz

76.8% Very good

MC Read 28.3

MC Write 30.2

MC Mixed 24.9

79% 27.8 GB/s

SC Read 14.7

SC Write 29.8

SC Mixed 21.5

63% 22 GB/s

Latency 82.4

49% 82.4 ns

TUR-User, 3 months ago.

2 of 2 slots used

32GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz

76.4% Very good

MC Read 28

MC Write 27.6

MC Mixed 26.2

78% 27.3 GB/s

SC Read 21.1

SC Write 31.6

SC Mixed 23.1

72% 25.3 GB/s

Latency 102

39% 102 ns

ZAF-User, 3 months ago.

2 of 4 slots used

32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz

74.8% Very good

MC Read 28.4

MC Write 28.6

MC Mixed 22.8

76% 26.6 GB/s

SC Read 16

SC Write 30.7

SC Mixed 23.5

67% 23.4 GB/s

Latency 80.7

50% 80.7 ns

POL-User, 1 month ago.

2 of 2 slots used

32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz

71.5% Very good

MC Read 26.6

MC Write 28.8

MC Mixed 21.1

73% 25.5 GB/s

SC Read 14.8

SC Write 27.1

SC Mixed 21.6

60% 21.2 GB/s

Latency 75.2

53% 75.2 ns

MYS-User, 3 months ago.

2 of 2 slots used

32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz

68.5% Good

MC Read 26.2

MC Write 27.6

MC Mixed 22.4

73% 25.4 GB/s

SC Read 10.3

SC Write 21.1

SC Mixed 15.5

45% 15.6 GB/s

Latency 77.4

52% 77.4 ns

321 MORE »

Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,001,328 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 9905712-035.A00G 2x16GB Builds (Compare 2,612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	1,692x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	920x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,555x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,056x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	324x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	120x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	109x

RAM
9905712-035.A00G 2x16GBKingstonBench 83%, 321 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular 9905712-035.A00G 2x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. ^[RAMPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ

What is the UBM value for money rating?

What is UBM Effective Speed?

Thunderbolt speed?

Are USB 3.0 cables different?

USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?

Why buy USB 3.0 today?

USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?

Graphics Cards

How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?

What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?

What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?

What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?

Memory Kits

What is the RAM value for money rating?

What is the effective RAM speed index?

What is the system memory latency ladder?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Kingston

9905712-035.A00G 2x16GB

Average Bench: 82.7% (45^th of 115)

Popular builds with this RAM

Very good average bench

Strengths

Good consistency

Weaknesses

Average Bench

Market Share (See Leaders)

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Popular 9905712-035.A00G 2x16GB systems:

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Group Test Results

Comments

Speed Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Kingston

9905712-035.A00G 2x16GB

Average Bench: 82.7% (45th of 115)

Popular builds with this RAM

Very good average bench

Strengths

Good consistency

Weaknesses

Average Bench

Market Share (See Leaders)

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Popular 9905712-035.A00G 2x16GB systems:

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Group Test Results

Share a related link

Comments

Speed Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback

Average Bench: 82.7% (45^th of 115)