Average Bench: 36.9% (110th of 113)

Based on 3,339 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB

Poor average bench

The Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB averaged 63.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 13.1GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 107ns

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB is 39.3%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 9.2GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 9.35GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 3,339 samples)
Min Avg Max
6.18 MC Read 13.1 21.1
4.8 MC Write 12.8 21.8
6.39 MC Mixed 12.9 18.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
3.6 SC Read 9.35 16
3.5 SC Write 9.2 17.4
4.18 SC Mixed 10.4 18.8
27.5% 9.64 GB/s
Min Avg Max
65.4 Latency 107 173
37.3% 107 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 20.3
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17.6
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.1
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 17
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
MC Read 8
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10.7
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 10
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 10.5
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 9
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
3,339 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 32,920,122 RAM Kits tested.

Typical CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB Builds (Compare 1,029 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $108

Popular CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2020 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

113 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $299Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback