Average Bench: 38.7% (103rd of 108)

Based on 2,701 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB

Poor average bench

The Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB averaged 61.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 13.8GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 13.6GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB is 42.2%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 9.73GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 9.89GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 2,701 samples)
Min Avg Max
5.66 MC Read 13.8 21.4
4.5 MC Write 13.6 22.2
5.7 MC Mixed 13.4 18.5
38.8% 13.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
2.87 SC Read 9.73 16
3.2 SC Write 9.89 18.2
3.5 SC Mixed 11 19.3
29.2% 10.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
64.9 Latency 104 178
38.5% 104 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.9
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 17.9
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 19.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 21
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 18.3
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.2
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 9.7
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 7.1
16% 5.53 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
MC Read 2.6
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.77 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 0.5
2% 0.83 GB/s
Latency 355
11% 355 ns
2,701 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 23,184,222 RAM Kits tested.

Typical CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB Builds (Compare 3,560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Dell Latitude E6410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $123

Popular CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

108 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback