TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Crucial

CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB

▲ 501 ▼

Release date ≤ Q4 2015.

Average Bench: 52.1% (87th of 108)

Based on 4,794 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB
Poor: 38%Average: 52.1% Great: 59%

Popular builds with this RAM

Average average bench

The Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB averaged 47.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 19.5GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 19.1GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB is 21.4%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 13GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 15.1GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 4,794 samples)
Rank 8752.1%
Min Avg Max
12.9 MC Read 19.1 21.8
12.5 MC Write 19.5 22.3
12.1 MC Mixed 16.5 18.8
52.4% 18.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
6.47 SC Read 13 16.1
5.3 SC Write 15.1 21.2
8.07 SC Mixed 16.1 20
42.1% 14.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
67.1 Latency 85.3 131
46.9% 85.3 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
60% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 17.8
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 19.9
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
56.2% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.9
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 19.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
55.8% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.4
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
55.5% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.8
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
54.6% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17.1
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 18.8
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
51.7% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 16.5
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 16.1
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
50.8% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.6
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 14.1
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
47.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
4,794 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 23,312,209 RAM Kits tested.

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB Builds (Compare 3,220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

CPU
Core i7-4712MQIntelBench 51%, 3,164 samples382x
Core i5-4210MIntelBench 43%, 8,799 samples366x
Core i5-4200MIntel  $39Bench 42%, 19,520 samples334x
GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 197,765 samples892x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 177,409 samples364x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 184,491 samples230x
SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,772 samples115x
MZNTY128HDHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 83%, 1,677 samples43x
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GBBench 71%, 12,905 samples35x
RAM
CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 52%, 4,794 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop Workstation

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
ererbe
Avatar level
12

Average

2 months ago.

No Real Problems, enough Ram, but not that fast.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 4 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB

108 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $154Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Test your PC Build a PC
Can You Run It?
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback