TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Crucial

CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≤ Q4 2015.

VS

Average Bench: 51.9% (87th of 108)

Based on 4,074 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB
Poor: 33%Average: 51.9% Great: 59%

Popular builds with this RAM

Average average bench

The Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB averaged 48.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 19.3GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 19.1GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB is 25.1%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 12.9GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 14.9GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 4,074 samples)
Rank 8751.9%
Min Avg Max
12 MC Read 19.1 21.7
12 MC Write 19.3 22.2
11.7 MC Mixed 16.5 18.7
52.2% 18.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
5.8 SC Read 12.9 16.6
4.8 SC Write 14.9 20.9
6.9 SC Mixed 15.8 19.9
41.6% 14.5 GB/s
Min Avg Max
67.7 Latency 86 144
46.5% 86 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
57.6% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 19
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
57.4% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 17.5
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 20.3
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
57.2% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 19
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 19.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
55.6% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
54.5% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 15.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
53.7% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 17.6
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
51.1% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.4
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
4,074 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 18,031,038 RAM Kits tested.

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB Builds (Compare 2,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

CPU
Core i7-4712MQIntelBench 50%, 2,562 samples318x
Core i5-4210MIntelBench 43%, 7,506 samples276x
Core i5-4200MIntel  $39Bench 42%, 16,981 samples272x
GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 5%, 183,189 samples705x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 7%, 153,154 samples276x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 6%, 153,297 samples171x
SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,341 samples93x
MZNTY128HDHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 82%, 1,353 samples34x
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GBBench 71%, 9,620 samples22x
RAM
CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 52%, 4,074 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop Workstation

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2019 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 3 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB

108 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $252Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $728SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Test your PC Build a PC
Can You Run It?
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback