TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Crucial

CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB

▲ 501 ▼

Release date ≤ Q4 2015.

Average Bench: 51.5% (93rd of 115)

Based on 9,208 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB
Poor: 32%Average: 51.5% Great: 59%

Popular builds with this RAM

Average average bench

The Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB averaged 48.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 19.4GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 19GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB is 27.1%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 13.1GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 98.7ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 9,208 samples)
Rank 9351.5%
Min Avg Max
11.3 MC Read 19 22
11.1 MC Write 19.4 22.3
11.8 MC Mixed 16.5 18.9
52.3% 18.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
5.72 SC Read 13.1 17.1
5.3 SC Write 15 22
7.35 SC Mixed 15.9 19.9
41.9% 14.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
70.2 Latency 98.7 162
40.5% 98.7 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
56% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 18
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.9
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
53% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 15.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.9
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
49% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 15.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15.9
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
46.8% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 14.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15.8
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
46.8% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 15
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
37.2% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
32.2% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 10.4
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
9,208 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 61,256,636 RAM Kits tested.

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65_W67RB

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples70x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples6x
Core i3-6100HIntelBench 56%, 313 samples4x
GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples56x
GTX 940MNvidiaBench 9%, 15,731 samples24x
SSD
S11-256G-PHISON-SSD-B27 256GBBench 77%, 224 samples24x
A400 480GBKingston  $24Bench 74%, 237,487 samples5x
M.2 SSD 256GBSpccBench 68%, 1,384 samples5x
RAM
CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 51%, 9,208 samples68x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2023 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
ererbe
Avatar level
12

Average

3 years ago.

No Real Problems, enough Ram, but not that fast.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 7 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $300Nvidia RTX 3060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $25
Intel Core i5-12600K $224Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $300Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $86
Intel Core i5-12400F $150Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $780Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback