Average Bench: 26.6% (113th of 113)

Based on 2,964 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 1x8GB

Very poor average bench

The Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 1x8GB averaged 73.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 108ns
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 9.17GB/s

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 1x8GB is just 18.5%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 1x8GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 7.29GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Mixed IO Bench 7.92GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 2,964 samples)
Min Avg Max
4.3 MC Read 9.17 11.3
4.3 MC Write 8.95 11
4.78 MC Mixed 7.95 9.6
24.8% 8.69 GB/s
Min Avg Max
2.3 SC Read 7.29 10.6
3.6 SC Write 8.28 11.7
3.2 SC Mixed 7.92 11
22.4% 7.83 GB/s
Min Avg Max
67.9 Latency 108 228
37% 108 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 8.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 8.9
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 8.2
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 7.9
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 5.7
19% 6.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns
2,964 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 28,353,145 RAM Kits tested.

Typical CT102464BF160B.M16 1x8GB Builds (Compare 4,149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular CT102464BF160B.M16 1x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2020 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

113 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $345Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback