Average Bench: 45.9% (100th of 113)

Based on 1,025 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 2x4GB

Below average average bench

The Crucial CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 2x4GB averaged 54.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 17GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 16.7GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 2x4GB is 38.5%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Crucial CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 2x4GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 11GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 12.6GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 1,025 samples)
Min Avg Max
7.11 MC Read 16.7 21.4
5.21 MC Write 17 21.3
6.4 MC Mixed 14.9 17.7
46.3% 16.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
2.8 SC Read 11 15.5
4.1 SC Write 12.6 19.8
3.9 SC Mixed 13 17.7
34.8% 12.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
66.3 Latency 92.1 173
43.4% 92.1 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 16.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 21
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 16.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.2
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.6
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 13.6
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 13.2
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7.8
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.5
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 6.4
17% 6 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.8
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 4.4
10% 3.6 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 0.7
SC Mixed 2.3
4% 1.5 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
1,025 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 44,311,720 RAM Kits tested.

Typical CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 2x4GB Builds (Compare 3,921 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 2x4GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2021 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

113 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback