TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

G.SKILL F3-12800CL9D-4GBXL

RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x2GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≤ Q4 2015.

Average Bench: 50.4% (95th of 113)

Based on 534 user benchmarks.  Model: G.SKILL F3-12800CL9-2GBXL 2x2GB
Poor: 30%Average: 50.4% Great: 63%

Popular builds with this RAM

Average average bench

The G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x2GB averaged 49.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 68.3ns
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 18.1GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x2GB is 33.3%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x2GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 13.1GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Mixed IO Bench 14.5GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 534 samples)
Rank 9550.4%
Min Avg Max
10.3 MC Read 18.1 22.3
6.8 MC Write 17.8 23
9.27 MC Mixed 16.3 20.5
49.7% 17.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
6.1 SC Read 13.1 17.5
5.57 SC Write 14.5 19.9
7.45 SC Mixed 14.5 19
40.1% 14 GB/s
Min Avg Max
55 Latency 68.3 99.2
58.5% 68.3 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
62.2% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 18.7
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 18.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
59.1% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 19.7
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.9
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
56.7% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.7
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
52.3% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
45.7% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.4
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.2
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
33.8% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 11.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
33.4% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 10.4
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.7
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
20.6% Poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 9.4
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 5.1
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
534 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 45,824,528 RAM Kits tested.

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x2GB Builds (Compare 5,115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H81M-E33 (MS-7817) - $98

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel  $98Bench 71%, 226,501 samples844x
Core i7-4790Intel  $226Bench 76%, 249,438 samples441x
Core i3-4170Intel  $96Bench 62%, 42,128 samples390x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 211,955 samples437x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 51,715 samples359x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $155Bench 31%, 843,846 samples351x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $29Bench 66%, 307,480 samples209x
A400 120GBKingston  $30Bench 59%, 152,637 samples166x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston  $69Bench 54%, 343,129 samples118x
RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x2GBG.SKILLBench 50%, 534 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $240

Popular RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x2GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2021 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 5 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB

113 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback