TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

G.SKILL F3-12800CL9D-4GBXL

RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x2GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≤ Q4 2015.

Average Bench: 50.6% (94th of 113)

Based on 444 user benchmarks.  Model: G.SKILL F3-12800CL9-2GBXL 2x2GB
Poor: 30%Average: 50.6% Great: 63%

Popular builds with this RAM

Average average bench

The G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x2GB averaged 49.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 68.1ns
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 18.2GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x2GB is 33.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x2GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 13.1GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 14.5GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 444 samples)
Rank 9450.6%
Min Avg Max
10.5 MC Read 18.2 22.4
6.83 MC Write 17.8 23.1
9.35 MC Mixed 16.3 20.6
49.8% 17.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
6.38 SC Read 13.1 17.7
5.6 SC Write 14.5 20.3
7.4 SC Mixed 14.5 19.2
40.1% 14 GB/s
Min Avg Max
55 Latency 68.1 98.4
58.8% 68.1 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
58.9% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 18.2
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 16.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
58.5% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 19.5
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 17.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
58.1% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.7
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
58.1% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17.9
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
34% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 12.6
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
31% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 11.6
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.4
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
28.6% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
23.8% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 7
22% 7.53 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
444 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 35,178,257 RAM Kits tested.

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x2GB Builds (Compare 3,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H81M-E33 (MS-7817) - $98

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel  $150Bench 71%, 184,518 samples508x
Core i7-4790Intel  $207Bench 77%, 198,375 samples253x
Core i3-4170Intel  $128Bench 64%, 34,251 samples223x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 4%, 192,548 samples255x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $146Bench 32%, 627,076 samples198x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 44,556 samples191x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $26Bench 68%, 208,236 samples120x
A400 120GBKingston  $20Bench 60%, 113,962 samples101x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston  $67Bench 55%, 298,362 samples66x
RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x2GBG.SKILLBench 51%, 444 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $289

Popular RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x2GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2020 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 4 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB

113 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $193Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback