Average Bench: 92.7% (15th of 115)

Based on 1,424 user benchmarks.  Model: G.SKILL F4-3600C17-8GVK 2x8GB

Excellent average bench

The G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB averaged just 7.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 36.7GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 31.7GB/s

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB is 55.7%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 68ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 23.3GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 1,424 samples)
Min Avg Max
23.2 MC Read 36.7 48
17.9 MC Write 31.7 47.4
18.8 MC Mixed 31 39.7
94.6% 33.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
13.5 SC Read 23.3 30.9
15.9 SC Write 30.7 48.1
17 SC Mixed 30.7 40
80.6% 28.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
46.2 Latency 68 103
58.8% 68 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 43
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 31.5
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 30.1
89% 31 GB/s
Latency 55.3
72% 55.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 28.8
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 44.4
SC Mixed 30.9
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 49.3
81% 49.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 36.9
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 31.5
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 40.7
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 39.6
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 36.7
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 37.3
100% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 30.8
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 37.3
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 34.7
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 32.2
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 40.2
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 35.6
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 32.5
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 21
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 22.9
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 24.4
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 18.7
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
1,424 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 66,987,534 RAM Kits tested

Typical Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB Builds (Compare 6,028 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $841

Popular Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback