| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Pro (all builds) |
| Memory | 59.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20171024 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 14 '18 at 21:27 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | JPN-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
82.4%
Excellent
|
82% 152 Pts
|
89% 750 Pts
|
107% 1,724 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 390.77
|
42%
Average
|
42% 50.9 fps
|
43% 51.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 428 424 416 331 296 MB/s
|
114%
Outstanding
|
97% 429 MB/s
|
179% 66.5 MB/s
|
261% 354 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 175 182 179 182 176 MB/s
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
52.8%
Above average
|
55% 19.2 GB/s
|
40% 13.9 GB/s
|
40% 100 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Pro Builds (Compare 73 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Pro
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 16x |
| Core i9-7900XIntel $462Bench 82%, 19,432 samples | 11x |
| Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 17x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 5x |
| RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $874 |