HP 860-003a

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 860-003a  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4B
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150908
Uptime30 Days
Run DateSep 15 '18 at 05:28
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 193
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 618
58% 481 Pts
64-Core 555
34% 555 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
HP(103C 2B62) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.1% Very good
Lighting 96.5
Reflection 102
Parallax 101
79% 99.9 fps
MRender 86.9
Gravity 90.6
Splatting 84
71% 87.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 240GB-$142
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHBi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 73 88 99 82 190 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.7% Average
Read 214
Write 65.7
Mixed 172
SusWrite 107
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 12.2
85% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 105
87% 127 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 171 166 170 164 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 130
Write 154
Mixed 73
SusWrite 165
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
488GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 109 109 109 109 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 78.5
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 108
64% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 M378A1K43BB1-CPB Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.2% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.8
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 18
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 860-003a Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

System: HP 860-003a

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $730
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback