Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '18 at 16:26
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$462
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 78.2
1-Core 142
2-Core 287
91% 169 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 1,036
90% 767 Pts
64-Core 1,268
78% 1,268 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 8472) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Lighting 31.9
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 36.4
26% 32.5 fps
MRender 40
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 32.3
30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1195 833 805 791 747 655 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 1,766
Write 1,140
Mixed 752
SusWrite 837
250% 1,124 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 53.9
220% 88 MB/s
DQ Read 1,317
DQ Write 1,288
DQ Mixed 1,125
894% 1,243 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 246%
Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
138GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 112 102 87 81 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 464
Write 414
Mixed 251
SusWrite 110
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 34.8
144% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 262
202% 282 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 119 123 124 123 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 138
Write 93.7
Mixed 74.1
SusWrite 120
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 97%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567, Sandisk Cruser Blade
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 3.5 3.9 4 4 4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
6.42% Terrible
Read 19
Write 12.4
Mixed 13.9
SusWrite 3.7
15% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
43% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.42%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$74
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.2% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 21.6
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 11.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $795
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback