Biostar N68S3B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar N68S3B  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110725
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 16 '18 at 22:51
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 240
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Memory 44.2
1-Core 34.9
2-Core 40
27% 39.7 Pts
4-Core 54.6
8-Core 61.1
8% 57.8 Pts
64-Core 53.6
3% 53.6 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a
Biostar(1565 1405) 32MB
Ram: 32MB, Driver: 309.8
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM0 01 HN-M320MB 320GB
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 8 32 66 61 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 91.9
Write 57.1
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 44.8
45% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
91% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair VS2GB1333D4 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM 533 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.97 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 1
4% 1.57 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68S3B Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar N68S3B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback