Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160516
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 20 '18 at 07:17
Run Duration359 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 146
60% 99.9 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 438
44% 358 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Asus(1043 04FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.1
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.6% Average
Lighting 56.6
Reflection 65.3
Parallax 73.6
46% 65.1 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 56.1
Splatting 54.3
48% 58.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 58 51 47 47 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 394
Write 115
Mixed 101
SusWrite 56.4
36% 167 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 22.8
103% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 52.5
71% 133 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 85%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
697GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 411 397 374 396 371 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Crucial C3000-240 240GB
18GB free
Firmware: 5.0.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 262 227 291 257 292 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 410
Write 288
Mixed 284
SusWrite 263
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 37
132% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 188
158% 232 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
199GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 66 66 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 81
Write 75.3
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 64.9
52% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 67%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$71
338GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 73 73 72 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 102
Write 103
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 72.2
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 100%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
193GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 63 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 83.8
Write 76.5
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 62.6
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 11.1
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback