Medionpc MS-7358

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Medionpc MS-7358 (all builds)
Motherboard	MICRO-STAR MS-7358
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090623
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '18 at 06:55
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad-$90 5,765 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	46.3% Average	Memory 74.2 1-Core 27.5 2-Core 55.1 37% 52.3 Pts	4-Core 109 8-Core 110 15% 109 Pts	64-Core 109 7% 109 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770 16,639 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Gigabyte(1458 2543) 1GB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Lighting 13.9 Reflection 10.1 Parallax 11.8 11% 11.9 fps	MRender 10.5 Gravity 10.4 Splatting 11.5 9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Msft Virtual Disk 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 236 Write 101 Mixed 109 32% 149 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 32.1 4K Mixed 15.8 63% 21.6 MB/s	DQ Read 96.8 DQ Write 46.9 DQ Mixed 51.4 44% 65 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 41%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75 16,709 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 13GB free Firmware: X2316RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 64 60 61 62 55 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.5% Average	Read 247 Write 166 Mixed 113 SusWrite 66.3 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 14.8 74% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 47.6 DQ Mixed 49.3 51% 86.7 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 91%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$80 10,362 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 49GB free SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 43 41 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Read 41.5 Write 42 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 42.4 29% 39.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 51%
Samsung HA250JC 250GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 25GB free SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 49 50 50 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 16.8 Write 50.1 Mixed 31 SusWrite 50.2 27% 37 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	18.6% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 5 16% 5.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.7 16% 5.6 GB/s	Latency 91.9 44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7358 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Medionpc MS-7358

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	7x
Core2 QuadIntel $90Bench 43%, 5,765 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	2x
GeForce 9300 GENvidiaBench 1%, 1,008 samples	2x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	1x

SSD
Solid State Disk 480GBSpccBench 81%, 3,502 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x
SD8SBAT064G 64GBSandiskBench 49%, 10 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	3x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16