Asus M4A87TD EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A87TD EVO (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110308
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '18 at 11:41
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	94%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70 18,839 User benchmarks, average bench 45% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	51.7% Above average	Memory 75.4 1-Core 43.2 2-Core 88 45% 68.9 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 156 22% 161 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT 20,826 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 82C2) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	4.84% Terrible	Lighting 5.83 Reflection 8.62 Parallax 1.91 5% 5.45 fps	MRender 8.67 Gravity 4 Splatting 5.96 5% 6.21 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.84% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: U21010RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 62 64 63 64 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 308 Write 256 Mixed 202 SusWrite 62 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 62.2 4K Mixed 8.8 68% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 31.3 DQ Write 99.4 DQ Mixed 11.3 24% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 86%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 132GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 63 64 64 64 63 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 89.5 Write 88.7 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 62.5 57% 77.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 63%
Seagate ST3300622AS 300GB-$130 728 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 83GB free Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 49 50 50 49 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	28% Poor	Read 48 Write 49 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 49.2 34% 45.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB 11,003 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM 667 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.5% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 11.6 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 9.4 22% 7.67 GB/s	Latency 89.4 45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO

CPU
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	36x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	25x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	6x
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	6x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	4x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	3x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	4x
F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GBUnknownBench 29%, 5 samples	3x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $241

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16