Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core m3-7Y30 4,585 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Memory 75.9 1-Core 71.9 2-Core 121 55% 89.6 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 204 28% 206 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 615 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 11,115 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	4.38% Terrible	Lighting 6.03 Reflection 8.12 Parallax 5.78 5% 6.64 fps	MRender 8.57 Gravity 5.5 Splatting 0.04 3% 4.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.38% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Phison SATA SSD 128GB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: QHY11A SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 273 289 286 292 288 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Read 412 Write 247 Mixed 160 SusWrite 283 61% 276 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 64.5 4K Mixed 9.5 89% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 274 DQ Mixed 62.2 89% 162 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 92%
ST932042 3AS 320GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 65GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 41 40 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Read 35.7 Write 39.6 Mixed 27 SusWrite 40.2 49% 35.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 46% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung H9CCNNNBJTMLAR-NUD 2x4GB 211 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	65.8% Good	MC Read 23 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 22.6 68% 23.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 25.4 SC Mixed 18.8 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 88.5 45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16