Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	54.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170906
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 06 '18 at 18:13
Run Duration	346 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Memory 84.2 1-Core 135 2-Core 235 85% 152 Pts	4-Core 448 8-Core 819 76% 633 Pts	64-Core 1007 62% 1007 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2383) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 411.70 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.3% Poor	Lighting 33.1 Reflection 38.2 Parallax 31.1 27% 34.1 fps	MRender 47.3 Gravity 33.1 Splatting 43.2 34% 41.2 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 866GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1615 1519 1610 1625 1631 1641 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	276% Outstanding	Read 1,913 Write 1,779 Mixed 940 SusWrite 1,607 350% 1,560 MB/s	4K Read 42.3 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 58.6 198% 70.8 MB/s	DQ Read 969 DQ Write 813 DQ Mixed 873 659% 885 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 276% Great: 363%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 132GB free Firmware: DXM05B0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 300 Write 134 Mixed 216 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 97 4K Mixed 37 128% 51 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 151 140% 222 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 118%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 135GB free Firmware: 520ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 160 201 201 201 197 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Read 292 Write 253 Mixed 274 SusWrite 198 57% 254 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 90.6 4K Mixed 37.4 141% 52.6 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 245 DQ Mixed 227 180% 250 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 85%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 78GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 450 443 443 447 449 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 475 Write 452 Mixed 381 SusWrite 446 99% 438 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 53.6 182% 64.9 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 347 262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 915GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 450 444 443 447 449 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 442 Mixed 399 SusWrite 446 99% 438 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 54.5 184% 66.1 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 347 261% 350 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 926GB free Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1376 1220 1217 1212 1217 1215 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	248% Outstanding	Read 1,756 Write 1,610 Mixed 768 SusWrite 1,243 301% 1,344 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 53 188% 70 MB/s	DQ Read 1,013 DQ Write 951 DQ Mixed 910 702% 958 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 248% Great: 302%
Kingston SUV400S37960G 960GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 688GB free Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 431 364 135 119 130 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 73% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139 14,506 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	68.5% Good	MC Read 23.7 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 22.1 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 26 SC Mixed 19.9 58% 20.4 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,962 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	2,881x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	210x
Core i7-8086KIntel $399Bench 91%, 38,086 samples	182x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	753x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	359x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	295x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	210x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	169x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	158x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	186x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	173x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	128x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $1,049

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16