| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 6.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Alienware M14xR2 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Alienware M14xR2 |
| Memory | 6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120629 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 08 '18 at 14:16 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 24% |
PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.9%
Very good
|
72% 120 Pts
|
45% 369 Pts
|
30% 484 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M
Dell(1028 0552) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 24.21.14.1170
|
6.76%
Terrible
|
6% 7.48 fps
|
9% 10.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung SSD 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 388 392 394 395 385 MB/s
|
68.2%
Good
|
76% 336 MB/s
|
74% 25.4 MB/s
|
101% 145 MB/s
|
|
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
13GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.2 8.4 8 7.8 8.3 MB/s
|
7.62%
Terrible
|
19% 16.1 MB/s
|
22% 1.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
57.8%
Above average
|
58% 20.1 GB/s
|
48% 16.8 GB/s
|
60% 66.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M14xR2 Builds (Compare 298 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Alienware M14xR2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples | 116x |
| Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples | 83x |
| Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 35x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 191x |
| GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples | 103x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $420 |