Asus F2A55-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F2A55-M  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140429
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 10 '18 at 19:56
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 105
55% 85.2 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 187
27% 196 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D
Asus(1043 8526) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 6.15
Parallax 7.72
3% 5.89 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 6.47
Splatting 4.78
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 82 81 80 76 75 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.1% Above average
Read 244
Write 224
Mixed 190
SusWrite 85.1
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 31.9
117% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 93.2
89% 140 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 110%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$60
95GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 59 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 99.3
Write 90.7
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 59.6
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 58%
General UDisk 2TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.7 6.9 7.1 6.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
6.36% Terrible
Read 23
Write 5.3
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 6.1
15% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.36%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.5% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A55-M Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A55-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $161
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback