PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus H61M-E (all builds) |
Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130829 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 13 '18 at 04:06 |
Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
Run User | IDN-User |
Background CPU | 55% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
63.8%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Gigabyte(1458 36D9) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 60 1.9 12 23 84 MB/s
|
31.4%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD1600AABS-00PRA0 160GB
149GB free
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 70 67 71 71 MB/s
|
39.5%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
178GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 87 83 88 87 MB/s
|
47.5%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905471-006.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
59%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 157x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 118x |
Core i3-3240IntelBench 55%, 37,789 samples | 111x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 165x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 62x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 50x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $163 |